Restructuring the sales
A manufacturer of scooters needed to strengthen the sales distribution network in its home market in light of new market entrants. The ongoing problems included the following:
- some dealers and sub-dealers were operating at small sales volumes
- a number of dealers were experiencing decreasing margins
- a few dealers were operating at a loss
- the distribution network was at risk of dealers defecting to the competition
Critical issues included preserving solid national coverage, minimizing decrease in sales volume, reducing sub-dealer sales, and minimizing defections.
We restructured the dealer network.
- Reduced the number of dealers from 483 to 346
- Maintained sales volume (from 288,252 units to 286,495 units)
- Minimized dealer defection
- Increased average dealer margins by $56,000
- With a leaner distribution network, reduced distribution costs to the manufacturer by 10%
- With a leaner distribution network, reduced the company’s sales force
- Increased the company’s EBIT by $2.2 million
Restructured the dealer network for a leaner configuration and re-organized the company’s sales force accordingly.
Reduced the number of dealers from 488 to 346
- Shifted all company product flow to 269 distributor dealers
- Shut down 5 non-performing dealers
- Restructured 210 dealers
- Repositioned 73 tactical dealers
- Merged 158 marginal dealers with strong dealerships
Restructuring improved dealer economics as follows
- Increased average dealer sales volume by 38%
- Increased average dealer net margin by $56,000
Given a leaner distribution network, re-organized the company’s sales force
- Reduced the company’s national sales force from 108 to 57 FTEs
- Cut sales force costs by 48%
The impact of restructuring the distribution network and re-organizing the sale was as follows:
- Erected a stronger line of defense against new market entrants
- Improved dealer economics by increasing dealer net margin by $56,000
- Minimized dealer defection
- Maintained sales volume (from 288,252 units to 286,495 units)
- Reduced distribution costs to the company by 10%
- Improved the company’s EBIT by + $2.2m (+7%)